World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Symbiosis

Article Id: WHEBN0000039626
Reproduction Date:

Title: Symbiosis  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Root microbiome, Sea anemone, Ascomycota, Cleaning symbiosis, Aquaponics
Collection: Symbiosis
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Symbiosis

In a symbiotic mutualistic relationship, the clownfish feeds on small invertebrates that otherwise have potential to harm the sea anemone, and the fecal matter from the clownfish provides nutrients to the sea anemone. The clownfish is additionally protected from predators by the anemone's stinging cells, to which the clownfish is immune.

Symbiosis (from [3][4]

The definition of symbiosis is controversial among scientists. Some believe symbiosis should only refer to persistent mutualisms, while others believe it should apply to any types of persistent biological interactions (i.e. mutualistic, commensalistic, or parasitic).[5] After 130+ years of debate,[6] current biology and ecology textbooks now use the latter "de Bary" definition or an even broader definition (i.e. symbiosis = all species interactions), with absence of the restrictive definition (i.e. symbiosis = mutualism).[7]

Some symbiotic relationships are obligate, meaning that both symbionts entirely depend on each other for survival. For example, many lichens consist of fungal and photosynthetic symbionts that cannot live on their own.[3][8][9][10] Others are facultative, meaning that they can, but do not have to live with the other organism.

Symbiotic relationships include those associations in which one organism lives on another (

  • TED-Education video - Symbiosis: a surprising tale of species cooperation.
  • Media related to at Wikimedia Commons
  • The dictionary definition of at Wiktionary

External links

  • Burgess, Jeremy (1994), Forum: What's in it for me, New Scientist 
  • Boucher, Douglas H (1988), The Biology of Mutualism: Ecology and Evolution, New York: Oxford University Press,  
  • Cordes, E.E.; Arthur, M.A.; Shea, K.; Arvidson, R.S.; Fisher, C.R. (2005), "Modeling the mutualistic interactions between tubeworms and microbial consortia", PLoS Biol 3 (3): 1–10,  
  • Brinkman, F.S.L.; Blanchard, J.L.; Cherkasov, A.; Av-gay, Y.; Brunham, R.C.; Fernandez, R.C.; Finlay, B.B.; Otto, S.P.; Ouellette, B.F.F.; Keeling, P.J.; Others, (2002), "Evidence That Plant-Like Genes in Chlamydia Species Reflect an Ancestral Relationship between Chlamydiaceae, Cyanobacteria, and the Chloroplast", Genome Research 12 (8): 1159–1167,  
  • Danforth, B.N.; Ascher, J. (1997), "Flowers and Insect Evolution", Science 283 (5399): 143,  
  • Douglas, Angela (2010), The Symbiotic Habit, Princeton University Press,  
  • Douglas, Angela (1994), Symbiotic interactions, Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press,  
  • Facey, Douglas E.; Helfman, Gene S.; Collette, Bruce B. (1997), The diversity of fishes, Oxford: Blackwell Science,  
  • Golding, RS; Gupta, RS (1995), "Protein-based phylogenies support a chimeric origin for the eukaryotic genome", Mol. Biol. Evol. 12 (1): 1–6,  
  • Harrison, Rhett (2002), "Balanced mutual use (symbiosis)", Quarterly journal Biohistory 10 (2), retrieved 2007-09-23 
  • Harrison, Maria J. (2005), "Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis", Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59: 19–42,  
  • Lee, J. (2003), "Amphiprion percula" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web, retrieved 2007-09-29 
  • Isaac, Susan (1992), Fungal-plant interactions, London: Chapman & Hall,  
  • Isaak, Mark (2004), CB630: Evolution of obligate mutualism,  
  • Martin, Bradford D.; Schwab, Ernest (2012), "Symbiosis: 'Living together' in chaos", Studies in the History of Biology 4 (4): 7–25 
  • Martin, Bradford D.; Schwab, Ernest (2013), "Current usage of symbiosis and associated terminology", International Journal of Biology 5 (1): 32–45,  
  • Moran, N.A. (2006), "Symbiosis", Current Biology 16 (20): 866–871,  
  • Nardon, P.; Charles, H. (2002), "Morphological aspects of symbiosis", Symbiosis: Mechanisms and Systems. Dordercht/boson/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers 4: 15–44,  
  • Paracer, Surindar; Vernon, Ahmadjian (2000), Symbiosis: an introduction to biological associations, Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press,  
  • Powell, Jerry (1992), "Interrelationships of yuccas and yucca moths", Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7 (1): 10–15,  
  • Nair, S. (2005), "Bacterial Associations: Antagonism to Symbiosis", in Ramaiah, N, Marine Microbiology: Facets & Opportunities;, National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, pp. 83–89, retrieved 2007-10-12 
  • Roughgarden, J.; Gomulkiewicz; Holt; Thompson (1975), "Evolution of Marine Symbiosis--A Simple Cost-Benefit Model", Ecology 56 (5): 1201–1208,  
  • Saffo, M.B. (1993), "Coming to terms with a field: Words and concepts in symbiosis", Symbiosis. 14 (1-3), retrieved 2007-10-05 
  • Sagan, Dorion; Margulis, Lynn (1986), Origins of sex: three billion years of genetic recombination, New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press,  
  • Sagan, Dorion; Margulis, Lynn (1997), Microcosmos: Four Billion Years of Evolution from Our Microbial Ancestors, Berkeley: University of California Press,  
  • Sapp, Jan (1994), Evolution by association: a history of symbiosis, Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press,  
  • Sapp, Jan (2009), The New Foundations of Evolution. On the Tree of Life, New York: Oxford University Press 
  • Toller, W. W.; Rowan, R.; Knowlton, N. (2001), following Experimental and Disease-Associated Bleaching"M. faveolata and Montastraea annularis"Repopulation of Zooxanthellae in the Caribbean Corals , The Biological Bulletin (Marine Biological Laboratory) 201 (3): 360–373,  
  • Townsend, Colin R; Begon, Michael; Harper, John D. (1996),  
  • Weiblen, G.D. (2002), "How to be a fig wasp", Annual Review of Entomology 47 (1): 299–330,  
  • Wernegreen, J.J. (2004), "Endosymbiosis: lessons in conflict resolution", PLoS Biology 2 (3): e68,  

Bibliography

  1. ^ σύν, βίωσις. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project
  2. ^ "symbiosis".  
  3. ^ a b Wilkinson 2001
  4. ^ Douglas 1994, p. 1
  5. ^ Douglas, Angela E. (2010), The symbiotic habit, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 5–12,  
  6. ^ Martin, Bradford D.; Schwab, Ernest (2012), "Symbiosis: 'Living together' in chaos", Studies in the History of Biology 4 (4): 7–25. 
  7. ^ Martin, Bradford D.; Schwab, Ernest (2013), "Current usage of symbiosis and associated terminology", International Journal of Biology 5 (1): 32–45.,  
  8. ^ Isaac 1992, p. 266
  9. ^ Saffo 1993
  10. ^ Douglas, Angela E. (2010), The symbiotic habit, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, p. 4,  
  11. ^ a b c d Moran 2006
  12. ^ a b c Ahmadjian & Paracer 2000, p. 12
  13. ^ a b c "symbiosis." Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2007. Credo Reference. Web. 17 September 2012
  14. ^ Sapp 1994, p. 142
  15. ^ Nardon & Charles 2002
  16. ^ a b Ahmadjian & Paracer 2000, p. 6
  17. ^ "symbiosis." The Columbia Encyclopedia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008. Credo Reference. Web. 17 September 2012.
  18. ^ Toller, Rowan & Knowlton 2001
  19. ^ Harrison 2005
  20. ^ Lee 2003
  21. ^ Facey, Helfman & Collette 1997
  22. ^ M.C. Soares, I.M. Côté, S.C. Cardoso & R.Bshary (August 2008). "The cleaning goby mutualism: a system without punishment, partner switching or tactile stimulation". Journal of zoology 276 (3): 306–312.  
  23. ^ Klicpera, A; PD Taylor; H Westphal (1 Dec 2013). "Bryoliths constructed by bryozoans in symbiotic associations with hermit crabs in a tropical heterozoan carbonate system, Golfe d’Arguin, Mauritania". Mar Biodivers (Springer Berlin Heidelberg) 43 (4): 429–444.  
  24. ^ Cordes 2005
  25. ^ Piper, Ross (2007), Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual Animals, Greenwood Press.
  26. ^ Latorre, A.; Durban, A., Moya, A. & Pereto, J. (2011). The role of symbiosis in eukaryotic evolution. Origins and evolution of life - An astrobiological perspective. pp. 326–339. 
  27. ^ Moran, N. A. (1996). "Accelerated evolution and Muller's ratchet in endosymbiotic bacteria.". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93: 2873–2878.  
  28. ^ Andersson, Siv G.E; Kurland, Charles G (1998). "Reductive evolution of resident genomes". Trends in Microbiology 6 (7): 263–8.  
  29. ^ Wernegreen, J.J. (2002). "Genome evolution in bacterial endosymbionts of insects.". Nature reviews, Genetics 3 (11): 850–861.  
  30. ^ Nair 2005
  31. ^ Ahmadjian & Paracer 2000, p. 7
  32. ^ The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. (n.d.). Amensalism (biology). Retrieved September 30, 2014, from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/19211/amensalism
  33. ^ Lidicker, William Z. (August 1979). "A Clarification of Interactions in Ecological Systems". BioScience 29 (8): 475–7.  
  34. ^ Townsend, Begon & Harper 1996
  35. ^ Wernegreen 2004
  36. ^ Ahmadjian & Paracer 2000, pp. 3–4
  37. ^ Brinkman 2002
  38. ^ Golding & Gupta 1995
  39. ^ "Symbiosis." Bloomsbury Guide to Human Thought. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd, 1993. Credo Reference. Web. 17 September 2012.
  40. ^ Schüßler, A. et al. (2001), : phylogeny and evolution"Glomeromycota"A new fungal phylum, the , Mycol. Res. 105 (12): 1416,  
  41. ^ Sagan & Margulis 1986
  42. ^ Harrison 2002
  43. ^ Danforth & Ascher 1997

References

See also

Symbiosis played a major role in the co-evolution of flowering plants and the animals that pollinate them. Many plants that are pollinated by insects, bats, or birds have highly specialized flowers modified to promote pollination by a specific pollinator that is also correspondingly adapted. The first flowering plants in the fossil record had relatively simple flowers. Adaptive speciation quickly gave rise to many diverse groups of plants, and, at the same time, corresponding speciation occurred in certain insect groups. Some groups of plants developed nectar and large sticky pollen, while insects evolved more specialized morphologies to access and collect these rich food sources. In some taxa of plants and insects the relationship has become dependent,[42] where the plant species can only be pollinated by one species of insect.[43]

Co-evolution

The biologist Dorion Sagan, "Life did not take over the globe by combat, but by networking."[41]

Symbiogenesis

About 80% of vascular plants worldwide form symbiotic relationships with fungi, for example, in arbuscular mycorrhizas.[40]

Vascular plants

[39] While historically, symbiosis has received less attention than other interactions such as

Leafhoppers protected by an army of meat ants

Symbiosis and evolution

Synnecrosis is a rare type of symbiosis in which the interaction between species is detrimental to both organisms involved.[13] It is a short-lived condition, as the interaction eventually causes death. Because of this, evolution selects against synnecrosis and it is uncommon in nature. The term is rarely used.[33]

Synnecrosis

Amensalism is the type of relationship that exists where one species is inhibited or completely obliterated and one is unaffected. This type of symbiosis is relatively uncommon in rudimentary reference texts, but is omnipresent in the natural world. There are two types of amensalism, competition and antibiosis. Competition is where a larger or stronger organisms deprives a smaller or weaker one from a resource. Antibiosis occurs when one organism is damaged or killed by another through a chemical secretion. An example of competition is a sapling growing under the shadow of a mature tree. The mature tree can begin to rob the sapling of necessary sunlight and, if the mature tree is very large, it can take up rainwater and deplete soil nutrients. Throughout the process the mature tree is unaffected. Indeed, if the sapling dies, the mature tree gains nutrients from the decaying sapling. Note that these nutrients become available because of the sapling's decomposition, rather than from the living sapling, which would be a case of parasitism. An example of antibiosis is Juglans nigra (black walnut), secreting juglone, a substance which destroys many herbaceous plants within its root zone. [32]

Amensalism

A parasitic relationship is one in which one member of the association benefits while the other is harmed.[31] This is also known as antagonistic or antipathetic symbiosis.[13] Parasitic symbioses take many forms, from endoparasites that live within the host's body to ectoparasites that live on its surface. In addition, parasites may be necrotrophic, which is to say they kill their host, or biotrophic, meaning they rely on their host's surviving. Biotrophic parasitism is an extremely successful mode of life. Depending on the definition used, as many as half of all animals have at least one parasitic phase in their life cycles, and it is also frequent in plants and fungi. Moreover, almost all free-living animals are host to one or more parasite taxa. An example of a biotrophic relationship would be a tick feeding on the blood of its host.

Flea bites on a human is an example of parasitism.

Parasitism

Commensal relationships may involve one organism using another for transportation (metabiosis). Examples of metabiosis are hermit crabs using gastropod shells to protect their bodies and spiders building their webs on plants

Commensalism describes a relationship between two living organisms where one benefits and the other is not significantly harmed or helped. It is derived from the English word commensal used of human social interaction. The word derives from the medieval Latin word, formed from com- and mensa, meaning "sharing a table".[16][30]

Phoretic mites on a fly (Pseudolynchia canariensis).

Commensalism

Adaptation of the endosymbiont to the host's lifestyle leads to many changes in the endosymbiont–the foremost being drastic reduction in its genome size. This is due to many genes being lost during the process of metabolism, and DNA repair and recombination. While important genes participating in the DNA to RNA transcription, protein translation and DNA/RNA replication are retained. That is, a decrease in genome size is due to loss of protein coding genes and not due to lessening of inter-genic regions or open reading frame (ORF) size. Thus, species that are naturally evolving and contain reduced sizes of genes can be accounted for an increased number of noticeable differences between them, thereby leading to changes in their evolutionary rates. As the endosymbiotic bacteria related with these insects are passed on to the offspring strictly via vertical genetic transmission, intracellular bacteria goes through many hurdles during the process, resulting in the decrease in effective population sizes when compared to the free living bacteria. This incapability of the endosymbiotic bacteria to reinstate its wild type phenotype via a recombination process is called as Muller's ratchet phenomenon. Muller's ratchet phenomenon together with less effective population sizes has led to an accretion of deleterious mutations in the non-essential genes of the intracellular bacteria.[27] This could have been due to lack of selection mechanisms prevailing in the rich environment of the host.[28][29]

During mutualistic symbioses, the host cell lacks some of the nutrients, which are provided by the endosymbiont. As a result, the host favors endosymbiont's growth processes within itself by producing some specialized cells. These cells affect the genetic composition of the host in order to regulate the increasing population of the endosymbionts and ensuring that these genetic changes are passed onto the offspring via vertical transmission (heredity).[26]

Mutualism and endosymbiosis

[25]There are also many types of tropical and sub-tropical ants that have evolved very complex relationships with certain tree species.
[24] hydrothermal vents and cold seeps in all of the world's oceans.deep-sea. The worm has no digestive tract and is wholly reliant on its internal symbionts for nutrition. The bacteria oxidize either hydrogen sulfide or methane, which the host supplies to them. These worms were discovered in the late 1980s at the hydrothermal vents near the Galapagos Islands and have since been found at cold seeps and hydrothermal vents that live at bacteria and symbiotic tube worms siboglinidOne of the most spectacular examples of obligate mutualism is between the

Another non-obligate symbiosis is known from encrusting bryozoans and hermit crabs that live in a close relationship. The bryozoan colony (Acanthodesia commensale) develops a cirumrotatory growth and offers the crab (Pseudopagurus granulimanus) a helicospiral-tubular extension of its living chamber that initially was situated within a gastropod shell.[23]

A further example is the goby fish, which sometimes lives together with a shrimp. The shrimp digs and cleans up a burrow in the sand in which both the shrimp and the goby fish live. The shrimp is almost blind, leaving it vulnerable to predators when outside its burrow. In case of danger the goby fish touches the shrimp with its tail to warn it. When that happens both the shrimp and goby fish quickly retreat into the burrow.[21] Different species of gobies (Elacatinus spp.) also exhibit mutualistic behavior through cleaning up ectoparasites in other fish.[22]

An example of mutual symbiosis is the relationship between the ocellaris clownfish that dwell among the tentacles of Ritteri sea anemones. The territorial fish protects the anemone from anemone-eating fish, and in turn the stinging tentacles of the anemone protect the clownfish from its predators. A special mucus on the clownfish protects it from the stinging tentacles.[20]

[19] fungi, which help in extracting water and minerals from the ground.mycorrhyzal carbon from the air, and fix Most land plants and land ecosystems rely on mutualisms between the plants, which [18] A large percentage of

Bryoliths document a mutualistic symbiosis between a hermit crab and encrusting bryozoans; Banc d'Arguin, Mauritania

Mutualism is any relationship between individuals of different species where both individuals benefit.[16] In general, only lifelong interactions involving close physical and biochemical contact can properly be considered symbiotic. Mutualistic relationships may be either obligate for both species, obligate for one but facultative for the other, or facultative for both. Many biologists restrict the definition of symbiosis to close mutualist relationships.

Hermit crab, Calcinus laevimanus, with sea anemone.

Mutualism

Ectosymbiosis, also referred to as exosymbiosis, is any symbiotic relationship in which the symbiont lives on the body surface of the host, including the inner surface of the digestive tract or the ducts of exocrine glands.[12][15] Examples of this include ectoparasites such as lice, commensal ectosymbionts such as the barnacles that attach themselves to the jaw of baleen whales, and mutualist ectosymbionts such as cleaner fish.

Endosymbiosis is any symbiotic relationship in which one symbiont lives within the tissues of the other, either within the cells or extracellularly.[12][14] Examples include diverse microbiomes, rhizobia, nitrogen-fixing bacteria that live in root nodules on legume roots; actinomycete nitrogen-fixing bacteria called Frankia, which live in alder tree root nodules; single-celled algae inside reef-building corals; and bacterial endosymbionts that provide essential nutrients to about 10%–15% of insects.

Alder tree root nodule

Physical interaction

Contents

  • Physical interaction 1
  • Mutualism 2
    • Mutualism and endosymbiosis 2.1
  • Commensalism 3
  • Parasitism 4
  • Amensalism 5
  • Synnecrosis 6
  • Symbiosis and evolution 7
    • Vascular plants 7.1
    • Symbiogenesis 7.2
    • Co-evolution 7.3
  • See also 8
  • References 9
  • Bibliography 10
  • External links 11

[13]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.