World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Catholic politicians, abortion and communion or excommunication

Article Id: WHEBN0034129970
Reproduction Date:

Title: Catholic politicians, abortion and communion or excommunication  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Catholic Church and abortion, Versus populum, Canon of the Mass, Liturgical reforms of Pope Pius XII, Eucharist in the Catholic Church
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Catholic politicians, abortion and communion or excommunication

The Roman Catholic Church opposes abortion. Church officials have threatened to refuse communion to Catholic politicians who support abortion rights. In some cases, officials have stated that the politicians should refrain from receiving communion; in others, excommunication has been suggested.

In the United States

General statements

In 2004, there was discussion of whether communion should be refused to American Catholic politicians who voted for legalizing abortion.[1] With a few American bishops in favor of withholding communion from politicians and the majority against, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops decided that such matters should be decided on a case-by-case basis by the individual bishops.[2] In 2005, Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Pittsburgh said no individual bishop should on his own deny communion to politicians because of "national ramifications", and suggested that such an action should be taken only on the basis of a two-thirds majority of all of the bishops or as mandated by the Vatican, while bishops Thomas Olmsted of Phoenix and Charles J. Chaput of Denver stated they would act on their own initiative and apply the sanctions put forward by a 2004 USCCB document entitled "Catholics in Political Life",[3] though only, Chaput declared, in "extraordinary cases of public scandal".[4] In 2008, Raymond Burke, former archbishop of St. Louis and assigned in that year to the Vatican, said communion should not be given to such politicians, arguing that support for abortion rights is a mortal sin that makes a person unfit for communion, and denial of communion would prevent other Catholics from thinking, because they see that pro-choice politicians can receive communion, that being pro-choice is an acceptable political position.[2]

A minority of American bishops support denying communion to pro-choice Catholic legislators, interpreting canon 915 as justifying such action.[5][6] In 2009, Wuerl argued that communion was not intended to be used as a weapon and that a pastoral approach would be more effective for changing minds than a canonical one.[7]

These statements of intent from church authorities have sometimes led American Catholic voters to vote for candidates who wish to ban abortion, rather than pro-choice candidates who support other Catholic Church positions on issues such as war, health care, immigration, or lowering the abortion rate.[8] Penalties of this kind from bishops have generally targeted Democrats, possibly because pro-choice Catholic Democrats are more vocal in their support for abortion rights than the few pro-choice Catholic Republicans.[9]

Proposals to deny communion to pro-choice politicians are more common in the United States. Suggested reasons for this are a politicization of pastoral practice and abortion's constitutional status as a right.[1][2]

While there was thus disagreement among the bishops about the opportuneness of refusing the Eucharist to Catholic politicians promoting legalization of abortion, there was unanimity regarding the moral obligation of Catholic politicians who participate in what their Church considers a seriously sinful action to refrain from going to Communion, an obligation stated on several occasions.[4][10][2][11][12][13][14]


The first instance of a pro-choice politician being censured via denial of communion was in 1989.[15] During a special election for the California Senate, pro-choice Catholic Lucy Killea was barred from communion by Leo Thomas Maher, the bishop of San Diego.[9] She received communion in Sacramento with the consent of Bishop Francis Quinn.[16] The incident brought publicity to Killea's candidacy and gained her the voters' sympathy, helping her to win the election.[17][18]

In 1984, Cardinal John Joseph O'Connor, then archbishop of New York, considered excommunicating New York Governor Mario Cuomo.[19][20] He also condemned Cuomo's statements that support for abortion rights did not contradict Catholic teaching, but did not suggest that Cuomo should stop receiving communion.[21]

In January 2003, Bishop William Weigand of Sacramento said Governor of California Gray Davis, a Catholic who supported abortion rights, should stop taking communion.[9]

In 2004, Archbishop Burke said he would not give communion to 2004 presidential candidate and Senator [27]

In February 2007, as emerged two and a half years later, Bishop Thomas Tobin asked Representative Patrick Kennedy not to take communion because of his position on abortion.[28] Kennedy told the Providence Journal that Tobin also instructed priests in the diocese not to give him communion; Tobin denied this.[28] In 2007, Burke said that he would deny communion to 2008 Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani because of his views on abortion, and that Giuliani should not seek the sacrament.[22] In May 2008, Kansas City Archbishop Joseph Naumann said that Kathleen Sebelius should stop receiving communion because of her support for abortion rights, and that she should not again take it unless she publicly stated that she opposed abortion rights.[29][30][31]

After Joe Biden, a pro-choice Catholic, was nominated as a vice presidential candidate in the 2008 presidential election, Bishop Joseph Francis Martino of Biden's hometown of Scranton, Pennsylvania, said Biden would be refused communion in that diocese because of his support for abortion rights.[8] Biden was not refused communion in his then-parish of Wilmington, Delaware.[32]


In Europe, Catholic bishops have less often raised the question of refusing communion to pro-choice Catholic legislators: there "rigorous principles coexist with more flexible pastoral customs".[2] In January 2001, Pope John Paul II gave Communion to Mayor of Rome Francesco Rutelli, whose position is that of being "personally opposed to abortion, but not willing to impose his stance through law". Similar cases are found among parliamentarians in Austria, Belgium and Germany.[1] When the Spanish Parliament voted to liberalize that country's abortion laws in 2010, the Bishops Conference declared that the parliamentarians who chose to vote for the new law were not excommunicated, but that they "seriously separated themselves from the church and should not receive Communion." King Juan Carlos, who was constitutionally required to sign the law, did not fall under any church sanctions.[33]

During parliamentary debate over changing Ireland's abortion laws to protect the lives of pregnant women, bishops in that country expressed positions both for and against denying communion to, or excommunicating, legislators who support changes to the law. Eamon Martin, successor to the archbishopric of Armagh, said that pro-choice politicians should not seek communion and were excommunicated. Diarmuid Martin, archbishop of Dublin, was asked for comment on Martin's statements, and responded that communion should not be a site of debate or used for publicity reasons.[34] Cardinal Sean Brady remarked that, among the bishops, "there would be a great reluctance to politicize the Eucharist".[35]


In May 2007, Pope Benedict XVI expressed support for the Mexican bishops' envisaged excommunication of politicians who had voted to legalize abortion in Mexico City. Responding to a journalist's question, "Do you agree with the excommunications given to legislators in Mexico City on the question?" the Pope said: "Yes. The excommunication was not something arbitrary. It is part of the (canon law) code. It is based simply on the principle that the killing of an innocent human child is incompatible with going in Communion with the body of Christ. Thus, they (the bishops) didn't do anything new or anything surprising. Or arbitrary."[36] According to Der Spiegel, many journalists were wondering if this support could be interpreted as a wish to excommunicate such politicians,;[37] Time magazine reported that it was in fact such a declaration.[38] However, church officials said that it was not a declaration but appeared to be a misunderstanding.[36] Federico Lombardi, director of the Holy See Press Office, clarified that the Pope was not excommunicating anyone, since the Mexican bishops had not in fact declared an excommunication, and that he did not mean to depart from a recent declaration that placed the decision to leave the Church in the hands of individual politicians. However, Lombardi said "politicians who vote in favor of abortion should not receive the sacrament of Holy Communion", because their action is "incompatible with participation in the Eucharist."[39]


In 2012, various news outlets reported that all Catholic legislators who supported the decriminalization of abortion in Uruguay were excommunicated by that country's conference of bishops.[40][41][42] This was the result of a misunderstanding and the secretary-general of the bishops’ conference later said that the penalty of automatic excommunication applies to those directly involved in an abortion, "which does not include those who vote for a law that allows it."[43]


  1. ^ a b c "The Word from Rome", John L. Allen, Jr. in National Catholic Reporter, 28 May 2004]
  2. ^ a b c d e Sandro Magister, "Obama's Pick for Vice President Is Catholic. But the Bishops Deny Him Communion"
  3. ^ Major, Richard (August 27, 2005), "Communion for pro-choice politicians splits Church", The Tablet 
  4. ^ a b Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, "It's a Matter of Honesty: To Receive Communion, We Need to Be in Communion"
  5. ^ Allen, John (Oct 31, 2008). "Antiabortion imperative more complex than acknowledged". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved 2014-05-08. 
  6. ^ , 12 April 2011National Catholic ReporterMichael Sean Winters, "Chaput Cites Disunity Among Bishops on Canon 915" in
  7. ^ Henneberger, Melinda (11 May 2009). "Wuerl: Why I Won't Deny Pelosi Communion". Politics Daily. 
  8. ^ a b Kirkpatrick, David (2008-09-16). "Abortion Issue Again Dividing Catholic Votes".  
  9. ^ a b c d Ainsworth, Bill (2004-06-09). "Catholics giving governor a pass on abortion" (pdf). The San-Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved 2011-12-26. 
  10. ^ Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Newark, "The Obligations of Catholics and the Rights of Unborn Children"
  11. ^ Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, "Worthiness to Receive Holy Communion: General Principles"
  12. ^ George Washington University, "Reactions to Sen. Obama's Selection of Sen. Biden as His Running Mate"
  13. ^ Code of Canon Law, canon 916
  14. ^ a b c Hancock, David (2004-04-06). "Kerry's Communion Controversy". CBS News. Retrieved 2011-12-26. 
  15. ^ "A Bishop Says No". Time. November 27, 1989. 
  16. ^ Lundstrom, Marjie (February 1, 2003). "Abortion foes cross line with attacks on elected officials". Sacramento Bee. 
  17. ^ "Abortion and Religion Put Focus on Election". New York Times. December 3, 1989. 
  18. ^ "Bishop Leo Maher, 75; Led San Diego Diocese". New York Times. February 25, 1991. 
  19. ^ Beltramini, Enrico (September 12, 2009). "Il cattolicesimo politico in America". Limes (in Italian). Retrieved 2011-12-26. 
  20. ^ West, John G.; MacLean, Iain S. (1999). Encyclopedia of religion in American politics, Volume 2. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 98. Retrieved 2011-12-26. 
  21. ^ , 26 April 2003Chicago TribuneMike Dorning, "Catholic politicians feel church heat on abortion" in
  22. ^ a b "Outspoken Catholic Archbishop Raymond Burke Says He'd Deny Rudy Giuliani Communion". Fox News. AP. 2007-10-03. Retrieved 2011-12-26. 
  23. ^ McAteer, Michael (June 26, 2004). "Questioning Catholic hierarchy's priorities". Toronto Star. 
  24. ^ Jacoby, Susan (May 3, 2004). "The Catholic Church and the Presidential Election: Vatican makes common cause with fundamentalist Protestants". San Francisco Chronicle. 
  25. ^ Balz, Dan; Cooperman, Alan (June 4, 2004). "Bush, Pope to Meet Today at the Vatican". Washington Post. 
  26. ^ Gibson, David (2007). The Rule of Benedict: Pope Benedict XVI and His Battle with the Modern World. HarperCollins. p. 42. 
  27. ^ Heyer, Kristin E.; Rozell, Mark J.; Genovese, Michael A. (2008). Catholics and politics: the dynamic tension between faith and power. Georgetown University Press. p. 21.  
  28. ^ a b "Bishop bars Patrick Kennedy from Communion over abortion". CNN. November 22, 2009. 
  29. ^ "For Sebelius, More Opposition from KC's Archbishop". The Atlantic. 5 March 2009. 
  30. ^ "Rigid bishops one-up the popes".  
  31. ^ Burke, Daniel (May 13, 2008). "Kansas Gov. Sebelius told not to take Communion". Religion News Service. 
  32. ^ Memoli, Mike (2008-12-24). "Abortion politics: Biden never refused communion". Retrieved 2011-12-26. 
  33. ^ "No Sanction for Spanish King Signing Abortion Law".  
  34. ^ Black, Fergus; Cunningham, Grainne (20 May 2013). "Top clerics divided on penalty for pro-choice Catholics". Irish Independent. 
  35. ^ Dalby, Douglas (3 May 2013). "Irish Catholic Church Condemns Abortion Legislation". International Herald Tribune. 
  36. ^ a b "Pope arrives in Brazil with tough abortion stance". USA Today (Associated Press service). 10 May 2007. 
  37. ^ Der Spiegel. Pope Attacks Mexico City Politicians. May 10, 2007.
  38. ^ Israely, Jeff (May 9, 2007). "Pope Rejects Pro-Choice Politicians". Time. 
  39. ^ "Pope condemns abortion on Latin America trip". Associated Press. May 9, 2007. 
  40. ^ "Iglesia dice que legisladores que votaron despenalización quedan excomulgados". El Observador. 2012-10-18. 
  41. ^ "1er medida de la Iglesia tras la despenalización del aborto" (in Spanish). Urgente24. 2012-10-18. 
  42. ^ "Iglesia Católica excomulgó a quienes incentivaron la despenalización del aborto".  
  43. ^ "Uruguay's bishops clarify: pro-abortion lawmakers not excommunicated". Retrieved 27 November 2013. 

See also

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.