World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Presidential Commission for the Study of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania

Article Id: WHEBN0008551796
Reproduction Date:

Title: Presidential Commission for the Study of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Vladimir Tismăneanu, Vladimir Socor, Emil Bodnăraș, Socialist Republic of Romania, Ruxandra Cesereanu
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Presidential Commission for the Study of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania

The Presidential Commission for the Study of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania (Romanian: Comisia Prezidenţială pentru Analiza Dictaturii Comuniste din România), also known as the Tismăneanu Commission (Comisia Tismăneanu), is a commission instituted in Romania by President Traian Băsescu to investigate the Communist regime and provide a comprehensive report allowing for the condemnation of Communism as experienced by Romania.

Formed in April 2006 as a panel headed by political scientist Vladimir Tismăneanu, it focused on examining the activity of institutions that enforced and perpetuated the communist dictatorship, "the methods making possible the abuses, the murders, the felonies of the dictatorship, the flagrant violations of human rights and the role of some political figures in the maintaining and the functioning of the totalitarian regime in Romania".

The Commission presented its final report to Parliament on December 18, 2006. It has been adopted as an official document of the Romanian Presidency and published on its website. The report made Romania the third former Eastern Bloc country (after the Czech Republic and Bulgaria) to officially condemn its Сommunist regime.[1][2][3] The quality, conclusions and choice of commission members of the report are subject to debate within Romanian society. Starting on January 8, 2007, modifications were made to the report to correct errors and omissions.[4]


The following members were selected by the Commission's President Vladimir Tismăneanu: Horia-Roman Patapievici, Dragoş Petrescu, Andrei Pippidi, Romulus Rusan, Levente Salat, Stelian Tănase, Cristian Vasile and Alexandru Zub.

Final report

Pillars, enforcers, and supporters of Communism

The report identifies several individuals as responsible for officially-endorsed violent methods. Several of their biographies were reviewed as part of the 660-page report. Among those identified included former Romanian President Manea Mănescu and Ion Iliescu. Among those found responsible for political indoctrination were Ion Iliescu, Mihai Roller, Paul Niculescu-Mizil, Valter Roman, and Silviu Brucan.

A special category comprises those participants in the cultural life who were found to have actively supported the Сommunist regime. The Report mentions Eugen Barbu, Corneliu Vadim Tudor, Dan Zamfirescu, Ion Dodu Bălan, Dinu Săraru, Adrian Păunescu, Ilie Bădescu, Mihai Ungheanu, Nicolae Dan Fruntelată, Artur Silvestri and Ilie Purcaru. The Săptămâna magazine, directed by Eugen Barbu and Corneliu Vadim Tudor, was considered "the main platform for manipulative pseudo-nationalism during the late years of the Ceauşescu regime".

The report mentions Mihai Bujor Sion and Leonte Tismăneanu among the main activists of the Romanian Communist Party. Those identified as involved in the regime's propaganda apparatus are Matei Socor (head of the Agerpres news agency), Paul Niculescu-Mizil, Leonte Răutu, Eugen Florescu and Ion Iliescu. Ghizela Vass and Ştefan Andrei were identified as main agents of the Communist regime involved in policies pertaining to external affairs.

In a speech accepting the report, Băsescu denounced the Communist regime as "illegitimate and criminal," claiming it used the Romanian people as "guinea pigs for an experiment."[3]

Other conclusions

The report also contradicts President Băsescu's earlier assertion (a thesis also supported also by the Left and nationalist groupings of the Romanian political spectrum) that the Communist secret police, the Securitate, can be divided into two distinct sections - one serving the regime, the other ensuring the nation's security. Vladimir Tismăneanu was quoted by Adevărul saying:

"We [the Commission] reject on a scientific basis the existence of two kinds of Securitate, one of before 1965, Cominternist and anti-patriotic, and the other one devoted to the people and to the patriotic values".[5]


Critics of the report of the Tismăneanu commission have focused on three problems: the choice of events and personalities included in the report, the moral authority of the commission members and the conclusions of the report.

Choice of events and Communist figures

Anti-Communist dissidents Victor Frunză and Ionel Cana published a protest letter criticising the fact that the report failed to mention Bessarabia and Bukovina, which were the main target of Soviet expansionism.[6] They contend that the pro-Soviet position concerning Bessarabia and Bukovina was one of the main "structural defects of the communist group of Romania". A similar position has been taken by other personalities such as Victor Roncea, president of the Civic Media Association, who denounced the crimes committed by the communists in Soviet-occupied Bessarabia and Bukovina before, during and after World War II.[7] The Communist repression on these two territories was proposed for inclusion in the report by dissident Paul Goma as early as May 2006, in an open letter to Romanian president Traian Băsescu.

Romanian journalist Ion Cristoiu considers the personalities nominated are perceived as political enemies of Traian Băsescu, the current president of Romania, who initiated the commission.[8] Writer and Ziua editor Dan Ciachir considers that the choice of events and the conclusions of the report put an undue weight on the relations between the Romanian Orthodox Church with the Communist regime, and especially in relation with the interdiction of the Romanian Greek Catholic Church.[9][10]

Moral authority of the commission

Tismăneanu's father was, according to the report, one of the main propagandists in charge of communist indoctrination. One of members of the Commission (Sorin Antohi) was a collaborator of the Securitate who lied about his academic credentials. Antohi is a close collaborator of Tismăneanu and still edits a scientific journal chaired by Tismăneanu. Another member, Metropolitan Nicolae Corneanu, resigned after declaring he was not aware of his nomination on the commission. Mihnea Berindei, also a member, was accused of being a Securitate collaborator. The exiled writer and dissident Paul Goma was invited and later fired from the commission after only nine days by Tismăneanu.

Conclusions of the report

Some critics have noted that condemning a political doctrine is useless because the crimes of the regime should be condemned, and dangerous because existing communist states could be taking it as an attack.[11] Some believe President Traian Băsescu's choice to declare the Communist regime as illegitimate on the basis of the report is also dangerous because it may be interpreted as an annulment of all international treaties in which Communist Romania took part.[11]

The volume Iluzia Anticomunismului[12] summarizes a number of critiques, including lack of narrative continuity, poor organization and failure to engage the problem at more than symbolic level. Sorin Adam Matei [13] criticizes the report for its lack of rigor, amalgamation with no obvious plan of various pre-written book chapters and articles, and for adopting as conclusion a document written before the report was even written. He also points to the lack of juridical basis or consequence of the report. He calls for a second edition of the report, a "Report on Communism 2.0" to be documented and rewritten by historians and legal scholars who have a sound understanding of the legal implications of such a document. Michael Shafir pointed to the fact that the language of the report is unsuitable for a historical work and leads to conceptual confusions. He believes that "genocide" is not an appropriate word in this context, that the head of the commission, V. Tismăneanu, used theories and concepts without proper attribution and that throughout the report a faulty citation policy has been used. It was also noted that the report mixes all victims of the Communist regime into a single category, making no distinction between democratic leaders and former Iron Guard members.[14] Important dissident leaders are also omitted from the report.[15]

On January 8, 2007, modifications to the report corrected some errors and omissions.[4] The legal status of these changes to a final report adopted as an official Presidency document is unclear.[16]

See also


  1. ^ "Romania condemns its communist past".  
  2. ^ "Romanian president, in a first for the nation, condemns its Communist dictatorship".  
  3. ^ a b Smith, Craig S. (2006-12-19). "Romanian Leader Condemns Communist Rule".  
  4. ^ a b The modification note on the web site of the Romanian Presidency
  5. ^ "Iliescu, Vadim şi Păunescu, stâlpii comunismului" (in Română).  
  6. ^ Dissident Victor Frunză interview in Jurnalul Naţional
  7. ^ Ziua 18-12-2006
  8. ^ Jurnalul Naţional 19-12-2006
  9. ^ Ziua, 31 Jan 2007
  10. ^ Ziua, 14 Feb 207
  11. ^ a b PUR press release of 18-12-2006
  12. ^ Ernu, V., Rogozanu, C., Siulea, C. si Ţichindeleanu, O. (2008). Iluzia Anticomunismului. Editura Cartier.
  13. ^ Raportul Comunismului 2.0
  14. ^ Michael Shafir interview in Ziua de Cluj
  15. ^ Ucis de Comisia Tismaneanu, article in Ziua
  16. ^ Tismaneanu is changing the "official state document" on the Internet

External links

  • (Romanian) Final Report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of the Communist Dictatorship in Romania
  • Final Report's Chapter on the Revolution of December 1989
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.